Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Elections

South Carolina Senate Seat Opens After Graham's Death; Democrats Seek Flip

South Carolina Senate Seat Opens After Graham's Death; Democrats Seek Flip

The vacancy in a state Republicans have held for decades creates a competitive dynamic that will test both parties' candidate recruitment and fundraising infrastructure ahead of November 2026.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 13, 2026

Democratic candidate Annie Andrews is actively courting South Carolina voters following the death of four-term Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who died Saturday, according to reporting by the Washington Examiner (July 13, 2026). Graham had represented South Carolina in the U.S. Senate since 2003, winning his most recent re-election in 2020 with approximately 54.5 percent of the vote, per certified South Carolina State Election Commission results. Andrews posted a video appeal on social media directed at Graham's voter base, signaling a strategy of cross-partisan outreach rather than solely mobilizing the Democratic base.

Prior to Graham's death, the race had been widely characterized as non-competitive, with Graham holding strong favorability among Republican voters in a state Donald Trump carried in 2024 by roughly 14 percentage points, per the South Carolina Election Commission's certified results. Andrews, a pediatrician and former state Democratic Party figure, had been the declared Democratic nominee. The circumstances of Graham's death and its date are confirmed by multiple news organizations; the specific cause has not been publicly detailed in the available record as of publication.

Under South Carolina law (S.C. Code § 7-11-50), when a U.S. Senate seat becomes vacant due to the death of a nominee before a general election, the relevant state party executive committee is authorized to select a replacement nominee. South Carolina Republican Party officials had not announced a replacement nominee as of this report. The Republican State Committee's timeline for that selection process is not yet established in any public filing reviewed for this story.

The financial landscape of the race will shift materially. Federal Election Commission records through the most recent quarterly filing (Q1 2026, ending March 31) showed Andrews had raised funds as a declared candidate, though specific totals for her campaign committee were not independently verified against FEC.gov filings at press time. The FEC's full Q2 2026 disclosures (covering April 1 through June 30) are due July 15, 2026, and will be the first data point reflecting fundraising in the period immediately preceding Graham's death. Those filings will be the primary public record revealing the financial positions of both parties entering the vacancy contest.

What remains unknown: the identity and fundraising history of any Republican replacement nominee, the South Carolina Republican Party's internal timeline for selection, and whether a special primary will be required under state law or whether the executive committee selection process will be the sole mechanism. The South Carolina Secretary of State's office and the South Carolina Republican Party's official communications would be the authoritative sources to answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com