Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Senate

Democrat Andrews Wins South Carolina Senate Seat, Calls for Leadership Change

Democrat Andrews Wins South Carolina Senate Seat, Calls for Leadership Change

A Democratic pickup in a state that last sent a Democrat to the Senate in 1998 adds to the party's midterm gains and introduces a new voice pressing for leadership turnover on both sides of the aisle.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · November 6, 2026

Sen.-elect Annie Andrews (D) won a U.S. Senate seat in South Carolina by defeating incumbent Sen. Darline Graham (R-S.C.), according to The Hill. The race was called in the 2026 midterm cycle, making Andrews one of the most closely watched results of the election night given South Carolina's consistent Republican voting history in statewide contests.

Andrews, in a post-election interview with Fox News anchor Bret Baier, stated that the results signal a need for change at the top of both parties in the Senate. "I still very much believe it's time for a generational change on both sides of the aisle," Andrews told Baier, as reported by The Hill on November 6, 2026.

South Carolina's U.S. Senate delegation had been held entirely by Republicans for decades. The state's senior senator, Tim Scott (R), was reelected in 2022. Prior to the Andrews result, the last Democrat elected to a U.S. Senate seat from South Carolina was Ernest Hollings, who last won election in 1998 and retired in 2005, according to official Senate historical records.

The Andrews victory is part of a broader Democratic pickup pattern in the 2026 midterms. As previously reported by The Congressional Times, Democrats won both the House and Senate as voter anger drove a midterm shift, with the South Carolina seat representing one of the more unexpected individual results within that national trend.

Andrews's call for "generational change" in Senate leadership was directed at both parties. She did not specify which current leaders she believes should step aside, and The Hill did not report any named targets. The existing Senate Democratic leadership structure, as of the 116th Congress through the current session, is a matter of public congressional record.

The October 2026 jobs report, released separately this week, provides economic context for the midterm environment in which Andrews ran. The U.S. Added 165,000 jobs in October, topping all analyst forecasts, with gains led by professional and business services and healthcare, according to Bloomberg. Average hourly earnings advanced and the unemployment rate edged lower, per Bloomberg's reporting of Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Whether economic conditions helped or hindered either party's candidates in South Carolina specifically is not established by available polling data at this time.

Andrews's margin of victory over Graham has not been reported in the available source material. The certified vote totals will be contained in the South Carolina State Election Commission's official canvass, which is a public record filed following the statutory certification period.

Graham's campaign has not issued a public statement on a potential recount or concession, based on available reporting. South Carolina state law governs the conditions under which a recount can be requested, and that filing, if any, would be a matter of public record with the State Election Commission.

Andrews's specific committee assignments in the incoming Senate have not yet been announced. Committee rosters for the new Congress are determined by party leadership and are published in the Congressional Record at the start of each session. Her legislative priorities beyond the leadership question were not detailed in available reporting.

What remains unknown: Andrews's winning vote margin, the full details of her policy platform as it was presented to South Carolina voters, and which Senate leadership positions she believes should change hands. Those answers would be found in the South Carolina State Election Commission certification, Andrews's official campaign disclosures on file with the FEC, and any subsequent floor statements or press releases entered into the Congressional Record.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com