Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Global Intelligence

Iran Supreme Leader Warns US and Israel Against Resuming Military Strikes

Iran Supreme Leader Warns US and Israel Against Resuming Military Strikes

The warning signals that Tehran perceives a credible risk of renewed military action and is using public statements to establish a deterrence posture before any such action occurs.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 31, 2026

Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei issued a formal warning to both the United States and Israel on Saturday, cautioning against launching new military strikes against the Islamic Republic, according to a written statement reported by Vanguard News. The statement came in the context of what Vanguard News described as threats from Iran's adversaries regarding a possible resumption of strikes.

The warning is notable for its direct address to two countries simultaneously, reflecting Tehran's assessment that both Washington and Tel Aviv are weighing military options. Khamenei's office released the statement in written form, a method the leadership has used in the past to communicate official positions with legal and diplomatic weight distinct from televised speeches.

The timing of the statement follows a period of elevated military tension across the Middle East region. Israel conducted strikes against Iranian-linked targets in Lebanon and Syria during 2024 and 2025, and the United States has maintained carrier strike groups and additional air assets in the region, according to U.S. Department of Defense public deployment records.

Iran's warning is addressed specifically to the possibility of a "resumption" of strikes, language that implies prior military exchanges rather than a hypothetical first conflict. The framing suggests Tehran views the current situation as a pause rather than a settled ceasefire, a distinction with significant implications for regional stability assessments.

Khamenei, who holds ultimate authority over Iran's military and foreign policy decisions under the Islamic Republic's constitutional structure, has issued similar warnings in prior periods of tension. In each prior instance, the statements were followed by diplomatic back-channel activity, though no public record of any current negotiations has been confirmed as of the date of publication.

The role of the United States is layered in this context. Washington and Tehran have no formal diplomatic relations, severed in 1980 following the Islamic Revolution and the hostage crisis. Any U.S. Military action against Iran would require either a presidential determination under existing authorizations or new congressional authorization, depending on the legal framework invoked.

Israel, for its part, has not publicly confirmed or denied plans for additional strikes on Iranian territory or Iranian-affiliated targets. The Israeli government's policy is generally to neither confirm nor deny specific military planning, a posture it has maintained consistently across administrations.

Ghana's Media Foundation for West Africa Executive Director Sulemana Braimah separately raised concerns on October 31 about the Mahama administration's record on illegal mining, a domestic governance issue with no confirmed connection to the Iran situation, per Joy Online Ghana.

What remains unknown in the Iran case is whether the warning from Khamenei was coordinated with any back-channel diplomatic communication to either Washington or Jerusalem, or whether it is a unilateral public deterrence move. Disclosure of any such communications, if they exist, would require official statements from the relevant governments or leaks to verified news outlets.

Historically, public statements from Iranian supreme leaders warning adversaries against military action have preceded both de-escalation periods and escalation events in roughly equal measure, making the statement alone an insufficient predictor of near-term outcomes. Analysts tracking the situation would require movement of military assets, changes in diplomatic positioning at the United Nations, or official responses from Washington or Jerusalem to assess the trajectory more precisely.

No official response from the U.S. State Department, the White House, or the Israeli Prime Minister's office had been reported as of publication on October 31, 2026.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com