Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Markets

Kalshi Seeks CFTC Approval for Margin Trading on Prediction Markets

Kalshi Seeks CFTC Approval for Margin Trading on Prediction Markets

A formal margin trading request from Kalshi Exchange places the CFTC at the center of a regulatory debate over how prediction markets should be classified and supervised under US law.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 23, 2026

Kalshi Exchange has submitted a margin trading request to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, according to remarks made September 23, 2026, by Brian Quintenz, a former CFTC Commissioner and current Kalshi Exchange board member, at the Financial Markets Quality Conference at Georgetown University. The disclosure was reported by Bloomberg.

Quintenz, who served as a CFTC Commissioner from 2017 to 2021, addressed the regulatory framework surrounding prediction markets and the question of whether broader public access to those markets is appropriate under existing law. His remarks were made in an interview with Bloomberg's Romaine Bostick.

Kalshi is a federally regulated prediction market exchange, having received CFTC designation as a Designated Contract Market in 2020. As a DCM, Kalshi operates under CFTC jurisdiction, which governs futures and derivatives contracts. The margin trading request, if approved, would allow participants on the platform to borrow funds to increase their position sizes in event contracts, a feature standard in futures markets but novel in the prediction market context.

The CFTC's review of the margin request raises questions about how the agency will classify the risk profile of event contracts relative to traditional futures instruments. The agency has not publicly announced a timeline for its decision. What would reveal the outcome is a formal CFTC order, either approving, modifying, or denying the request, which would be published in the Federal Register.

Prediction markets allow participants to trade contracts tied to the outcome of real-world events, including economic data releases, election results, and regulatory decisions. Prices on those contracts are interpreted as implied probabilities. Kalshi's contracts have included predictions on Federal Reserve interest rate decisions and macroeconomic indicators, making them relevant to US investors who track monetary policy.

The question of margin in prediction markets is not purely procedural. In standard futures markets, margin requirements are set to manage counterparty risk. The CFTC's Division of Clearing and Risk oversees those requirements under the Commodity Exchange Act. Applying a comparable framework to event contracts would require the agency to determine appropriate margin ratios for instruments whose underlying risk differs structurally from commodity or financial futures.

Alpa Patel, a partner at Kirkland and Ellis and a former SEC regulator, also spoke at the same Georgetown conference on September 23, addressing the separate but related question of private market access for retail investors, according to Bloomberg. Patel discussed the regulatory framework the SEC uses to determine who qualifies as an accredited investor and what changes, if any, might open private market participation to a broader public. The SEC's current accredited investor definition, last updated in August 2020 under Release No. 33-10824, requires individuals to meet income or net worth thresholds, or hold certain professional certifications.

The convergence of these two regulatory discussions, CFTC oversight of prediction markets and SEC gating of private market access, reflects a broader tension in US financial regulation over how to balance investor protection with market participation. Both the CFTC and SEC have faced public comment periods and congressional scrutiny on these questions without reaching final rule changes.

Kalshi's margin request arrives at a moment when prediction markets have grown in public visibility. During the 2024 US election cycle, trading volumes on event contract platforms drew attention from financial regulators and members of Congress. The CFTC had previously attempted to block Kalshi from offering election-related contracts, but a federal court ruled in Kalshi's favor in September 2024, a decision that expanded the scope of permissible event contracts under CFTC jurisdiction.

The next regulatory milestone to watch is the CFTC's formal response to Kalshi's margin application. Agency decisions of this type are published through the CFTC's Office of the Secretary and would constitute the definitive public record on how the commission intends to treat leveraged trading on event contracts going forward.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com