Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Secret Service Seeks Sword Removal From White House Perimeter Statues

Secret Service Seeks Sword Removal From White House Perimeter Statues

The proposed modifications illustrate how physical security priorities can intersect with federal historic preservation review processes, placing two institutional mandates in direct tension.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 16, 2026

Secret Service officials told members of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts on Tuesday that removing swords from statues near the White House perimeter is among the security modifications under active consideration, according to reporting by the Washington Examiner based on the agency's public remarks at that meeting. The disclosure came during a scheduled session of the Commission, a federal advisory body whose statutory mandate, codified in 40 U.S.C. § 9101, is to provide expert guidance to the federal government on matters of design and aesthetics affecting public buildings and spaces in the Washington, D.C. area.

Secure Service representatives also outlined plans to replace temporary fencing structures currently in use around the White House with permanent access control infrastructure, according to the same Washington Examiner account of the Tuesday meeting. The specific statues referenced, the precise design of proposed permanent fencing, and the projected cost of the modifications were not detailed in the publicly available record of the meeting as of the time of publication.

The Commission of Fine Arts, whose membership is appointed by the President, currently includes individuals appointed by President Donald Trump. The Washington Examiner reported that Trump had appointed political loyalists to the Commission. The legal basis and timeline of those appointments would be reflected in the Commission's publicly posted membership records, available at cfa.gov. The Commission's role in this instance is advisory; final decisions on security infrastructure rest with the Secret Service and, for matters involving appropriated funds, with Congress.

The intersection of security planning and aesthetic review is not new to the White House perimeter. A previous round of permanent perimeter fencing upgrades, approved and funded through congressional appropriations during the Biden administration following the January 6, 2021 security review, was documented in Department of Homeland Security budget justification materials submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. Whether the current modifications proposed by the Secret Service require new congressional appropriations, reprogramming of existing funds, or fall within existing DHS discretionary authority is not established in the available public record.

Several material facts remain unknown. The full cost estimate for the proposed permanent access control measures has not been disclosed in any public filing reviewed for this report. The specific statues whose swords the Secret Service proposes to alter have not been publicly identified by agency officials. The Commission of Fine Arts' formal advisory response to the Secret Service's proposals, if one has been issued, was not available in reviewed public records as of publication. The DHS congressional budget justification for Fiscal Year 2026 and any Secret Service reprogramming notifications submitted to the House and Senate Homeland Security Appropriations subcommittees would be the documents most likely to contain cost and funding details.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com