Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Global Intelligence

UK Court Convicts Two Men of Spying for Iran to Target Journalists

UK Court Convicts Two Men of Spying for Iran to Target Journalists

The verdicts establish a documented pattern of Iranian state-directed operations against media figures on British soil, raising questions about the reach of foreign intelligence services in...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · November 12, 2026

A UK court has found two Iranian nationals guilty of conducting espionage on behalf of Iran's intelligence services as part of a plan to subject UK-based journalists to serious violence, according to BBC News.

Mostafa Sepahvand, 41, and Farhad Javadi Manesh, 46, were each convicted of engaging in conduct likely to assist Iranian intelligence, the BBC reported. The court's verdict, delivered November 12, 2026, determined that both men participated in surveillance or facilitation activities directed at journalists operating within the United Kingdom.

The Israeli military confirmed this week a separate strike on the Nasser hospital compound in Khan Younis, Gaza, stating the target was a senior Hamas official and other members of Hamas's armed wing whom the military said were operating from within the facility, according to El Comercio. That strike left six people dead and more than 20 wounded, the report stated. That development is separate from the UK espionage case but illustrates the breadth of Iran-aligned regional activity in the same period.

Returning to the UK case: the specific journalists targeted by the alleged Iranian operation were not named in public reporting available at the time of publication. The BBC report identified the charge as conduct likely to assist Iranian intelligence, a formulation under UK national security law that does not require prosecutors to prove a completed act of violence, only that the defendants' actions were capable of advancing a hostile intelligence operation.

Iran has not publicly acknowledged directing the two men. The Iranian government has historically denied involvement in plots against dissidents and journalists abroad, a position it has maintained in prior cases brought by Western governments.

The UK government has pursued several prosecutions related to Iranian state activity in recent years. In 2023, British authorities charged multiple individuals in separate cases linked to alleged Iranian plots against critics and journalists living in the United Kingdom. The November 2026 verdict in the Sepahvand and Manesh case adds to that documented legal record.

Journalists who cover Iranian affairs, including those connected to Persian-language broadcasters and diaspora publications operating from London, have previously reported receiving threats and surveillance. The Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders have both documented cases of Iranian nationals abroad facing harassment linked to their reporting, though neither organization was cited as a source in the BBC's account of this specific trial.

The convictions carry implications beyond the two individuals. Under UK law, findings that defendants acted to assist a foreign intelligence service can be used in subsequent civil or governmental proceedings to establish patterns of state-directed conduct. Whether the Crown Prosecution Service or the Home Office will pursue further designations or expulsions in connection with this case is not yet known. A Home Office announcement, a CPS sentencing statement, or a parliamentary statement by the Home Secretary would be the records most likely to reveal next steps.

The case also arrives amid broader governmental attention to foreign interference operations in Western democracies. The UK's National Security Act 2023 expanded the legal tools available to prosecutors pursuing state-directed espionage and created a foreign influence registration scheme, though that scheme's application to this case has not been confirmed in available public records.

Sentencing dates for Sepahvand and Manesh had not been announced in the reporting available at the time of publication. The BBC report did not specify which court issued the verdict or which judge presided. Those details, along with the identities of the targeted journalists, remain unknown pending official court records or further reporting.

This story is relevant to previously reported foreign espionage activity. The Congressional Times covered a related case of alleged Chinese intelligence targeting of a congressional office in Lawmaker Reports Chinese Espionage Operation Targeted Congressional Office.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com