Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
World

Russia and Ukraine Hold First Direct US-Backed Talks Since February

Russia and Ukraine Hold First Direct US-Backed Talks Since February

The resumption of direct negotiations, however limited in scope, marks a procedural shift in the diplomatic track that has been stalled for most of 2026.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · November 10, 2026

Russia and Ukraine held direct, US-backed talks for the first time since February 2026, according to South China Morning Post. The meeting represents the first confirmed face-to-face diplomatic contact between the two governments in approximately nine months.

The talks were facilitated with United States involvement, according to the South China Morning Post report dated November 10, 2026. The specific location, the full composition of the delegations, and the precise agenda items discussed were not fully disclosed in the available source material at time of publication.

Direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine effectively collapsed in the spring of 2022, shortly after Russia's full-scale military invasion began in February of that year. A brief round of talks in Belarus and then Istanbul in March and April 2022 did not produce a ceasefire agreement, and both sides have since accused the other of acting in bad faith during those sessions.

The February 2026 talks referenced in the South China Morning Post report as the previous point of contact were themselves a resumption after a multi-year break. The conditions under which those February discussions occurred, and what they produced, have not been detailed in the currently available source material.

US involvement in facilitating the November 2026 session places Washington in a mediating role. What specific commitments, if any, the United States made to either party to bring them to the table is not established by the available source material. A formal statement from the US State Department would clarify the scope of American participation.

The geographic and military situation on the ground in Ukraine as of November 10, 2026, provides the backdrop for these discussions. Active combat operations have continued along the eastern front throughout 2026, according to multiple prior reporting cycles. Whether any preliminary conditions, such as a local ceasefire or a prisoner exchange framework, accompanied the talks is not confirmed by available sources.

Both Russia and Ukraine have domestic political constraints that shape their negotiating positions. Russian President Vladimir Putin has consistently stated that any settlement must reflect territorial realities on the ground, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly affirmed that Ukraine will not formally cede sovereign territory as a condition of peace.

The involvement of the United States follows a period in which the Trump administration, which took office in January 2025, signaled a desire to press for a negotiated end to the conflict. Special envoy appointments and indirect contacts with both governments were reported by multiple outlets throughout 2025 and into 2026, though no formal framework had produced direct talks until now.

What happens next depends on whether both parties agree to a follow-on meeting, what the United States chooses to offer or withhold as leverage, and whether European governments, who are not reported as participants in this session, seek a role in any structured process. None of those outcomes are established by the current source material.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com