Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Crypto Markets

BlackRock IBIT Records $1.66 Billion in Outflows Across Seven Sessions

BlackRock IBIT Records $1.66 Billion in Outflows Across Seven Sessions

Seven consecutive days of net withdrawals from the largest US spot Bitcoin ETF signal a measurable shift in institutional positioning, though the duration and magnitude of the trend remain subject...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · November 10, 2026

BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the largest US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund by assets, recorded net outflows totaling $1.66 billion across seven consecutive trading sessions, according to CoinTelegraph. The seven-session outflow streak is the primary data point currently available; the specific start date of the streak was not stated in the source material.

On the most recent trading day covered by that report, Monday, US spot Bitcoin ETFs as a category shed a combined $201 million in net withdrawals, per the same CoinTelegraph report. IBIT accounted for the dominant share of that figure, though a precise per-fund breakdown for Monday alone was not provided in the available source material.

IBIT launched in January 2024 following SEC approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. As of its most recent SEC filing available prior to this report, IBIT had accumulated tens of billions of dollars in assets under management, making it the most heavily traded Bitcoin ETF product on US exchanges. The scale of a $1.66 billion outflow must be read against that asset base; the percentage drawdown relative to total AUM was not calculable from the data provided.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs differ from futures-based Bitcoin ETFs in that they hold actual Bitcoin rather than derivatives contracts. When investors redeem shares, the authorized participant must sell underlying Bitcoin to satisfy the redemption, meaning sustained outflows from spot products can place direct selling pressure on Bitcoin's spot price. The precise market-impact relationship between ETF redemptions and Bitcoin price movement depends on market depth and timing, neither of which was specified in the source material.

The seven-session streak represents a reversal from the inflow pattern that characterized much of IBIT's first year of trading. In its early months after the January 2024 launch, IBIT attracted record daily inflows on multiple occasions, drawing comparisons to the fastest ETF launches in US history by assets gathered, according to prior industry reporting. What has changed in investor sentiment over the current period is not stated in the available source material; factors that would clarify this include Bitcoin's spot price movement over the same seven sessions, broader risk-asset flows, and any public statements from large institutional holders.

The broader US spot Bitcoin ETF market, which includes products from Fidelity, Invesco, VanEck, and others, recorded the $201 million combined outflow on Monday. Whether other individual ETFs also recorded consecutive-session outflow streaks was not specified in the source material.

For US investors, spot Bitcoin ETFs provide exposure to Bitcoin within standard brokerage accounts without requiring a cryptocurrency wallet or exchange account. Outflows from these products are publicly reportable because ETFs disclose daily creation and redemption activity, making IBIT one of the more transparent instruments for tracking institutional Bitcoin demand.

The $1.66 billion figure covers seven trading sessions. At that average rate, the per-session outflow is approximately $237 million. Whether the pace accelerated or decelerated within those seven sessions was not broken out in the available data.

What would fully explain the outflow trend includes: Bitcoin's price performance during the same period, any macro catalyst such as Federal Reserve policy signals or equity market volatility, and any large single-investor redemption that may have driven the aggregate figure. None of those details were confirmed in the source material as of publication.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com