Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Global Intelligence

South Africa Local Elections 2026: ANC Loses Ground to ActionSA, DA

South Africa Local Elections 2026: ANC Loses Ground to ActionSA, DA

Early results from South Africa's 2026 local elections indicate a continued erosion of ANC dominance in both urban and rural municipalities, a trend that could reshape coalition politics nationally.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · November 5, 2026

South Africa's African National Congress is losing support across municipal boundaries in the country's 2026 local government elections, according to early vote counts reported by Daily Maverick on November 5, 2026. Results were still being tallied as of Wednesday afternoon, but the direction of movement was consistent in both cities and rural areas.

The Democratic Alliance (DA) and ActionSA both recorded gains relative to prior elections, according to the same Daily Maverick report. The report did not specify the exact vote share percentages for each party at the time of publication, as counting remained ongoing.

The ANC has governed South Africa at the national level since the end of apartheid in 1994. In the 2021 local government elections, the party received approximately 46 percent of the vote nationally, its lowest result in a local election to that point, according to South Africa's Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) official results published in November 2021.

In the 2024 national and provincial elections, the ANC's share dropped further to approximately 40 percent, ending its outright parliamentary majority for the first time since 1994, according to IEC official results published in June 2024. That result forced the ANC into a Government of National Unity with multiple parties, including the DA.

ActionSA, founded by former Johannesburg Mayor Herman Mashaba in 2021, has positioned itself as a centrist alternative to the ANC. The party contested the 2021 local elections and secured representation in several municipalities, including Johannesburg, according to IEC records. Its continued growth in 2026, as indicated by Daily Maverick's early reporting, would represent a consolidation of its standing as a third force in South African politics.

The DA, which governs the Western Cape province and the City of Cape Town, has sought to expand its base beyond its historically dominant regions. Any gains in municipalities outside the Western Cape would mark a geographic broadening of its support, though the Daily Maverick report did not specify which particular municipalities showed the strongest DA movement.

Local government elections in South Africa determine control of municipalities, which are responsible for delivering services such as water, electricity, sanitation, and housing. Poor service delivery has been a central grievance cited by voters across party lines in multiple election cycles, according to reporting by South Africa's public broadcaster SABC and independent outlets over successive election periods.

The political composition of major metros such as Johannesburg, Tshwane, and Ekurhuleni has been contested and unstable since 2016, when opposition parties first formed coalition governments in those cities. Those coalitions collapsed and reformed multiple times through 2021 and beyond, according to reporting by the Mail and Guardian and Daily Maverick across that period.

If the ANC fails to secure majorities in key municipalities in the 2026 count, it would be required to negotiate coalition arrangements again, a process that has historically produced governance instability at the local level. The final vote tallies from the IEC would confirm or revise the early directional signals reported on election day.

The implications of these local results extend to national political dynamics ahead of South Africa's next national election, scheduled for 2029. A continued decline in ANC local vote share would increase pressure on the party's internal leadership structures and its terms within the Government of National Unity. Full certified results from the IEC were not yet available at the time of publication.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com