Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

34 Charged Nationally as Six More Noncitizens Face Federal Illegal Voting Counts in California

34 Charged Nationally as Six More Noncitizens Face Federal Illegal Voting Counts in California

The cumulative charge count under Operation Protect the Vote signals that federal prosecutors are treating noncitizen voting as a sustained enforcement priority heading into and beyond the 2026...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · November 2, 2026

Federal prosecutors in California announced charges Monday against six additional noncitizens accused of illegally registering and casting ballots in federal elections, bringing the total number of individuals charged under a Justice Department initiative to 34, according to a press conference held by First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, as reported by the New York Post.

Essayli described the effort as part of "Operation Protect the Vote," a federal enforcement program his office has been pursuing in the Central District of California. The six individuals charged Monday include an Iranian national and a Canadian national, according to the same press conference. Their names, the specific elections in which they allegedly voted, and the exact charges filed were not fully detailed in the available source material. Court filings in the Central District of California would contain those specifics.

The charges encompass two distinct alleged violations: illegal registration to vote in a federal election and the act of casting a ballot in a federal election as a noncitizen. Both are federal offenses under 52 U.S.C. Section 10307, which prohibits voting by individuals who are not U.S. Citizens in elections for federal office. Conviction under that statute carries a maximum penalty of one year in prison for registration violations and up to one year or more depending on specific charging instruments used.

The cumulative total of 34 charged individuals does not specify how many were charged solely with illegal registration versus those who allegedly cast ballots. That breakdown, which is material to assessing the scope of the alleged conduct, would be contained in individual indictments or criminal complaints filed with the court and available through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system.

Noncitizen voting has been a recurring subject of federal and state legislation in recent years. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, commonly called the SAVE Act, was reintroduced in the 119th Congress and would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. The bill passed the House as part of a budget reconciliation package in 2025 but its Senate status remained unresolved as of this publication's last reporting on the matter.

Current federal law already prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections, but critics of the existing system argue that automatic voter registration processes in states like California create conditions under which noncitizens may be registered without intent. California election officials and voting rights organizations have countered that state systems include attestation requirements and that verified instances of noncitizen voting are rare relative to the total electorate. Neither position is adjudicated by the charges filed Monday, which allege individual criminal conduct, not systemic failure.

California has approximately 39 million residents, of whom roughly 11 million are estimated to be noncitizens, including both lawful permanent residents and undocumented individuals, according to the Public Policy Institute of California's most recent population estimates. Noncitizens are not eligible to vote in any federal election in California or any other state.

The timing of the announcement, the day before the November 3, 2026, midterm elections, is a factual circumstance of record. DOJ policy, codified in Justice Manual Section 9-85.500, generally cautions against overt investigative steps that could influence an election within 60 days of a federal election. Whether the announcement complied with that guidance, and whether any internal review was conducted, is not addressed in the available source material. A press inquiry to the DOJ Office of Public Affairs would be the appropriate mechanism to obtain that answer.

The 2026 midterm elections are being closely watched for competitive races across multiple states. For context on competitive Senate contests being decided Tuesday, see TCT's earlier coverage: Texas Senate Race: Talarico and Paxton Face Voters on Election Eve.

What remains unknown includes the full names and nationalities of all 34 individuals charged under Operation Protect the Vote, the specific federal elections in which they allegedly voted, the districts of registration, and whether any of the 34 cases have resulted in guilty pleas or convictions to date. Those records are publicly available through PACER under the Central District of California docket and through any DOJ press releases cataloguing prior Operation Protect the Vote announcements.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com