Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Crypto Markets

Ethereum Sees 169,770 ETH Single-Day Exchange Outflow, Largest Since June

Ethereum Sees 169,770 ETH Single-Day Exchange Outflow, Largest Since June

The withdrawal scale matches a pattern Santiment has previously associated with accumulation behavior, though whether price follows that pattern this cycle remains to be seen.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 25, 2026

About 169,770 ETH left centralized cryptocurrency exchanges on a net basis in a single day on October 23, 2026, according to on-chain analytics firm Santiment. At a reference price of approximately $2,400 per ETH, the outflow represented roughly $407 million in value moved off exchanges in one session.

The October 23 figure is the largest single-day net exchange withdrawal recorded for Ethereum in more than four months, according to CryptoSlate, which cited Santiment data published on October 23. The last comparably sized outflow occurred on June 5, when approximately 223,800 ETH left exchanges in a single day. Santiment characterized that June episode as occurring near what it described as a local buying opportunity, meaning prices subsequently rose from that point.

Exchange outflows are a metric tracked by on-chain analysts because coins held on centralized exchanges are generally considered available for near-term sale, while coins moved to private wallets are considered removed from immediate selling pressure. A large net outflow therefore suggests a portion of holders chose to reduce their exchange-held balances on that date. The metric does not, by itself, confirm buyer intent or predict price direction.

The outflow data arrives against a backdrop of losses in US-listed Ethereum exchange-traded funds. According to CryptoSlate, ETF outflows for Ethereum surpassed $1 billion for the month of October as of the date of the report. The specific funds contributing to that aggregate figure and the daily breakdown were not itemized in the available source material. What fund-level data would reveal this is unknown and would require disclosure in individual fund daily flow reports filed with or published by the relevant issuers.

US-listed spot Ethereum ETFs were approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission and began trading in 2024. They allow US investors to gain price exposure to Ethereum without holding the asset directly. Monthly flow data for these products is relevant to US investors because outflows indicate net redemptions, meaning more capital left those funds than entered them over the measured period.

The combination of on-chain accumulation signals and ETF outflows presents two data points that move in opposite directions. On-chain withdrawal from exchanges suggests some holders are moving coins to self-custody, which analysts often interpret as reduced intent to sell. ETF outflows indicate that US institutional or retail investors accessing Ethereum through regulated fund structures withdrew a net total exceeding $1 billion in October. Whether those two trends reflect different investor populations, different time horizons, or simply coincident but unrelated behaviors is not determinable from the available data.

The $2,400 reference price cited in the Santiment report represents the approximate ETH price at the time of the October 23 data point. Ethereum reached highs above $4,000 in prior cycle peaks, according to publicly available market data. The current price level relative to those prior highs provides context for the ETF loss figure: a $1 billion monthly outflow against an asset trading at roughly 60 percent below its prior peak suggests investors in the ETF wrapper have not yet returned to peak-cycle enthusiasm.

The June 5 comparison cited by Santiment is the most directly relevant historical precedent in the source material. On that date, 223,800 ETH left exchanges, a figure approximately 32 percent larger than the October 23 episode. Santiment's characterization of June 5 as near a local buying opportunity is a retrospective observation. Whether the same outcome follows the October 23 withdrawal is unknown and would be revealed only by subsequent price data.

For US investors, the practical relevance of exchange outflow data depends on whether they hold ETH directly or through exchange-traded products. Those holding spot ETH may track on-chain metrics as a supply signal. Those holding US-listed ETFs are more directly affected by fund flow trends, since sustained outflows can create selling pressure on the underlying asset through the redemption mechanism that ETF issuers use to manage fund shares.

No official statement from any ETF issuer, the SEC, or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission was included in the available source material regarding the October ETF flow figures. The $1 billion aggregate outflow figure attributed to October was sourced to CryptoSlate's report citing Santiment. Independent confirmation from individual fund issuers' published flow data would provide additional precision on which funds drove the aggregate.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com