Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Trump DOJ Warns California Officials on Noncitizen Ballot Counting

Trump DOJ Warns California Officials on Noncitizen Ballot Counting

A formal DOJ letter and a presidential social media post together signal federal enforcement intent toward local election administrators ahead of November midterms, raising questions about what...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 17, 2026

President Donald Trump stated on October 17, 2026, that California election officials who count ballots cast by noncitizens will face prison time, citing a Department of Justice letter sent to Los Angeles County that outlined the legal consequences of tabulating such ballots. Trump wrote on Truth Social: "They will all go to jail for a long period of time," according to reporting by the Washington Examiner.

The DOJ letter, addressed to Los Angeles County, warned local election officials of federal criminal exposure if they knowingly count ballots belonging to noncitizens. The specific statutory provisions cited in the letter have not been publicly released in full as of publication. What statutes the DOJ invoked would be determinable from the full text of the letter, which is a public record subject to release under the Freedom of Information Act if not voluntarily disclosed.

Federal law prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections under 52 U.S.C. Section 20511 and 18 U.S.C. Section 611, the latter of which carries a penalty of up to one year in prison for a noncitizen who votes and up to one year for any person who knowingly causes a noncitizen's ballot to be cast or counted. The Washington Examiner report did not specify which statute the DOJ letter cited as the basis for its warning to county officials.

Los Angeles County operates one of the largest election administration systems in the United States, overseeing a voter rolls list that the California Secretary of State reported exceeded 5.7 million registered voters as of the 2024 general election, according to that office's publicly available voter registration statistics.

The DOJ letter is directed at county officials rather than state officials, a distinction that matters legally because county registrars of voters in California are the entities that physically tabulate ballots. The California Secretary of State sets statewide policy, but individual county election officials conduct the count. Whether the DOJ letter was sent to other California counties beyond Los Angeles County is unknown. A complete list of recipients would be contained in the DOJ's outgoing correspondence records.

The Trump administration's claim that noncitizen ballots are present in the Los Angeles County system rests on an as-yet-unspecified evidentiary basis. The Washington Examiner report did not describe what data or investigation the DOJ drew upon to assert that noncitizen ballots were cast. The underlying evidence, if any formal investigation has been opened, would be reflected in a U.S. Attorney's Office case file or FBI investigative record, neither of which has been made public.

California state law requires voters to attest under penalty of perjury that they are U.S. Citizens when registering to vote. Los Angeles County does not independently verify citizenship status against federal immigration databases at the point of voter registration, a policy that has been the subject of prior federal and state litigation. The county's position on the DOJ letter, as of publication, is unknown.

The midterm elections, scheduled for November 2026, are the immediate context for both the DOJ letter and Trump's Truth Social post. The Cook Political Report shifted 11 House seats toward Democrats in its October update, meaning the competitive landscape for the House majority is active, and any action affecting election administration in California, which holds 52 House seats, carries potential electoral significance.

The use of a presidential social media post to announce anticipated criminal penalties for local government officials is not a formal legal action. Formal prosecution would require a grand jury indictment or a criminal information filed in a U.S. District Court. No such filing has been reported as of publication. Whether the DOJ has convened a grand jury in the Central District of California related to this matter is unknown and would not be public unless charges were filed or a target received a formal notification letter.

What remains unknown: the full text of the DOJ letter and the specific statutes cited; the evidentiary basis for the DOJ's assertion that noncitizen ballots were cast in Los Angeles County; whether similar letters were sent to other counties or states; and whether any formal federal criminal investigation has been opened. The full DOJ letter, if not voluntarily released, could be obtained via a FOIA request to the DOJ Office of Legislative Affairs or the relevant U.S. Attorney's Office.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com