Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Foreign Policy

Trump Says Kim Jong Un Meeting Possible at November APEC Summit

Trump Says Kim Jong Un Meeting Possible at November APEC Summit

If a meeting occurs, it would mark the first direct Trump-Kim contact since the 2019 Hanoi summit collapsed, testing whether personal diplomacy can produce measurable progress on denuclearization...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 12, 2026

U.S. President Donald Trump stated publicly that he may meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit scheduled for November, according to Hani Korea, a South Korean news outlet that reported the remarks on October 13, 2026. Trump did not specify a date, location, or agenda for any potential meeting, and no official schedule has been confirmed by either government.

APEC's 2026 host has not yet publicly confirmed arrangements for bilateral meetings between non-member delegations, and the North Korean government has not issued any statement acknowledging Trump's remarks, as of October 12, 2026.

Trump and Kim have met in person three times previously: in Singapore in June 2018, in Hanoi in February 2019, and briefly at the Demilitarized Zone in June 2019. The Hanoi summit ended without agreement after negotiations over sanctions relief and nuclear facility closures broke down, according to contemporaneous reporting by Reuters and the Associated Press.

No substantive diplomatic contact between Washington and Pyongyang has been publicly documented since the 2019 DMZ encounter. North Korea has in the intervening period conducted multiple ballistic missile tests, which the United Nations Security Council has condemned as violations of standing resolutions. The most recent round of UN condemnations cited launches recorded through 2025, per the UN Security Council's public records.

North Korea's status as a nuclear-armed state is not formally recognized under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which Pyongyang announced its withdrawal in 2003. Since then, independent assessments by organizations including the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute have estimated that North Korea has continued to expand its nuclear arsenal, though precise figures remain uncertain because independent verification inside the country is not permitted.

The APEC summit format is a multilateral economic forum, and North Korea is not a member of APEC. A bilateral meeting between Trump and Kim at such a venue would require separate logistical arrangements outside the formal summit structure. Neither the White House nor the State Department has issued a statement confirming that such arrangements are underway.

South Korea's government, which under its mutual defense treaty with the United States is a central party to any negotiations affecting Korean Peninsula security, has not issued a public response to Trump's remarks as of the date of this report. What Seoul's position would be toward a resumed Trump-Kim dialogue is not known from available public sources.

China, which shares a border with North Korea and has historically served as Pyongyang's primary economic partner and diplomatic interlocutor, has also not publicly commented on Trump's statement. China's stated policy, per the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has been to support dialogue and denuclearization through negotiation.

What remains unknown is whether any preparatory contacts between U.S. And North Korean officials have taken place ahead of a potential summit. Such contacts, if they exist, would typically be disclosed through leaked reporting or official confirmation. Neither has occurred as of October 12, 2026.

The Trump administration's broader diplomatic posture toward Pyongyang has not been detailed in any formal policy document released to the public this year. Any clarity on U.S. Negotiating terms would require either a White House statement or congressional testimony from senior administration officials.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com