Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Security

Hijacker Rehearsed Tel Aviv Airport Attack Twice Before Flight

Hijacker Rehearsed Tel Aviv Airport Attack Twice Before Flight

The incident raises questions about security screening procedures at one of the region's most scrutinized airports, with the co-pilot's account pointing to a lone actor who studied the September...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 9, 2026

A hijacker rehearsed an attack at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport on two separate occasions before boarding the flight on which he carried out the incident, according to reporting by The Age. The co-pilot of the aircraft told authorities the attacker acted alone and drew direct inspiration from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, The Age reported on October 10, 2026.

The co-pilot's testimony, as reported by The Age, establishes that the hijacker made at least two preparatory visits to the airport before the flight in question. The specific dates of those rehearsal visits, the flight's origin and destination, and the outcome of the hijacking attempt have not been disclosed in the available source material. What those details would reveal is the full operational timeline and whether airport security procedures were tested or bypassed during the preparatory visits.

Ben Gurion International Airport, located near Tel Aviv, is administered by the Israel Airports Authority and is widely considered to operate one of the most intensive passenger screening regimes in the world. Israeli security protocols at the airport include behavioral profiling, multiple interview checkpoints, and baggage screening layers that exceed standard international requirements, according to published descriptions by the Israel Airports Authority and security analysts cited in prior reporting.

Despite those measures, the reported rehearsal visits suggest the attacker was able to study the airport environment without triggering a security response. Whether the rehearsals involved passing through security checkpoints, entering the terminal as a non-traveler, or observing procedures from public areas is not specified in the available source material. Clarification of that point would be material to any assessment of where the security process may have failed.

The co-pilot's statement that the hijacker cited the September 11, 2001 attacks as inspiration places the incident within a documented pattern of terrorist planning that uses prior high-profile attacks as operational and ideological reference points. The 9/11 Commission Report, published in 2004, documented how the 2001 attackers conducted surveillance flights and used commercial aviation procedures to plan the operation. Security analysts have noted in subsequent years that the 9/11 model has continued to influence planning by individuals and groups seeking to use aviation as a weapon.

Israel has faced repeated attempts to target its aviation infrastructure. The 1972 Lod Airport massacre, carried out by members of the Japanese Red Army on behalf of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, killed 26 people and led to the comprehensive overhaul of Israeli airport security that produced the current multi-layer system, according to historical records maintained by the Israeli government and cited in academic literature on aviation security.

The current incident occurs in a geopolitical environment marked by elevated security concerns across Israeli infrastructure. The Israeli government has been in active military operations in Gaza since October 2023, following the Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023, which Israeli and international sources documented as the deadliest single-day attack on Israeli civilians since the country's founding. The connection, if any, between the broader conflict and the hijacker's stated motivations has not been reported in the available source material.

The identity of the hijacker, the airline involved, the number of passengers aboard, and the current legal status of the suspect have not been reported in the available source material. Israeli law enforcement and aviation security authorities have not been quoted directly in the available reporting, and no official statement from the Israel Airports Authority, the Israeli government, or any airline has been included in the published account.

International aviation security standards are set by the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations specialized agency, under Annex 17 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which governs safeguarding of civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference. Whether the reported incident will prompt a review of compliance or trigger a formal ICAO inquiry is unknown based on currently available information.

The full scope of the incident, including whether the hijacking attempt was neutralized in flight, resulted in a diversion, or produced casualties, remains unreported in the source material reviewed for this article. Further official statements from Israeli authorities or the airline involved would be required to establish a complete factual record.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com