Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Markets

Blockchain.com Files CFTC Application for U.S. Crypto Derivatives, Prediction Markets

Blockchain.com Files CFTC Application for U.S. Crypto Derivatives, Prediction Markets

The application tests how far CFTC registration can extend crypto derivatives access to U.S. Retail and institutional investors under existing event-contract rules.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 9, 2026

Blockchain.com has submitted applications to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission seeking designation as a designated contract market and registration as a derivatives clearing organization, according to a report by CNBC published October 9, 2026. The filings would allow the company to offer U.S.-regulated event contracts and cryptocurrency derivatives to American users.

The CFTC is the primary federal regulator for derivatives markets in the United States, operating under the Commodity Exchange Act. Designated contract market status, defined in Section 5 of that Act, is required for any exchange that lists futures or options contracts accessible to U.S. Persons. Blockchain.com's application places it in a queue alongside other platforms that have sought or obtained similar standing, including CME Group and the Cboe Futures Exchange.

Event contracts, sometimes called prediction markets, allow participants to take positions on the outcome of specified real-world events. The CFTC has authority over such contracts when they are structured as commodity contracts, though the agency has also exercised its power to block contracts it determines are contrary to the public interest under Section 5c(c)(5)(C) of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Blockchain.com is one of the older firms in the digital asset sector, having launched its wallet product in 2011. The company operates a crypto exchange and custody services alongside its wallet. Its current user base and transaction volumes were not disclosed in the CNBC report; those figures would be found in any prospectus or public disclosure accompanying the CFTC filing.

The application arrives as U.S. Regulatory posture toward crypto derivatives has shifted. The CFTC has approved crypto-linked futures products for several exchanges over the past several years, and the agency's 2024 and 2025 enforcement actions have focused more narrowly on fraud and unregistered activity rather than on blocking all digital-asset derivatives outright.

Prediction markets have seen renewed attention from U.S. Regulators and courts. Kalshi, a CFTC-registered exchange, won a federal court ruling in 2024 that allowed it to list contracts on U.S. Congressional election outcomes after the CFTC had sought to block those contracts. That ruling, from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, narrowed the agency's authority to reject event contracts on public-interest grounds. Blockchain.com's application would be evaluated under the same statutory framework.

For cryptocurrency derivatives specifically, the CFTC has maintained that Bitcoin and Ether are commodities, a classification that places them within the agency's jurisdiction for futures and swaps. Blockchain.com's filing would, if approved, let U.S. Customers trade futures or options linked to those and potentially other digital assets through a regulated venue, with clearing provided through the company's own registered clearing organization.

The practical effect of approval would be to give Blockchain.com a domestic regulatory umbrella that offshore crypto derivatives platforms lack when serving U.S. Customers. Unregistered offshore venues are prohibited from soliciting U.S. Persons for futures or swaps under CFTC rules, creating a structural advantage for any firm that completes the registration process.

The CFTC review timeline for designation applications is not fixed by statute. The agency publishes applications in the Federal Register and opens a comment period before acting. The length of that process depends on the complexity of the application and the volume of public comment. It is not yet known when the CFTC will publish Blockchain.com's application for comment or when a decision is expected; those steps would be announced through the agency's official public notices.

Blockchain.com did not release a public statement beyond what was reported by CNBC. The company's revenue figures, capital adequacy, and proposed rule sets for the exchange and clearing house, all of which the CFTC evaluates in a designation proceeding, were not available in the public record as of the date of this report.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com