Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Market Analysis

Blockchain.com Files with CFTC for U.S. Prediction Markets and Crypto Derivatives

Blockchain.com Files with CFTC for U.S. Prediction Markets and Crypto Derivatives

The application, if approved, would expand regulated access to cryptocurrency derivatives and event contracts for U.S. Retail and institutional participants under a federal oversight framework.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 9, 2026

Blockchain.com has submitted applications to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission seeking designation as a designated contract market and registration as a swap execution facility, with the goal of offering event contracts and cryptocurrency derivatives to U.S. Customers, according to a report published October 9, 2026 by CNBC.

The CFTC is the primary federal regulator for U.S. Derivatives markets, including futures and swaps. A designated contract market designation would allow Blockchain.com to list standardized contracts for trading by the general public, while a swap execution facility registration would permit the platform to operate a trading system for swaps between eligible counterparties, according to CFTC definitions published on the agency's official website, cftc.gov.

Event contracts, sometimes called prediction markets, allow participants to take positions on the outcome of specific future events, including economic data releases, regulatory decisions, or other measurable occurrences. The CFTC has authority under the Commodity Exchange Act to approve or reject such contracts, and has previously blocked certain prediction market applications on the grounds that the contracts were contrary to the public interest.

Blockchain.com is one of the largest cryptocurrency infrastructure companies by user count. The company reported in its publicly available materials that it has served more than 40 million verified users across its wallet and exchange products. The company is privately held and does not file public earnings reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The application represents one of several moves by crypto-focused firms to seek formal CFTC registration rather than operating in regulatory gray areas. Kalshi, a competing prediction market platform, received CFTC approval in an earlier period and has since expanded its contract offerings. Whether Blockchain.com's application will be treated similarly or face additional scrutiny is not yet known. The outcome would be determined by the CFTC's review process, which includes a public comment period.

Crypto derivatives have been a contested regulatory area between the CFTC and the SEC. The CFTC has asserted jurisdiction over Bitcoin and Ether as commodities, while the SEC has pursued enforcement actions against exchanges listing tokens it classifies as securities. The Blockchain.com filing lands squarely in CFTC territory by framing its products as commodity derivatives and event contracts rather than securities.

The timing of the application follows a period of shifting regulatory posture at the CFTC. The agency under its current leadership has signaled greater openness to engaging with crypto firms through formal registration rather than enforcement-first approaches, though no formal CFTC statement on the Blockchain.com application had been published as of the date of this report.

For U.S. Investors, approval would create a federally regulated venue for trading cryptocurrency derivatives and event contracts, an option currently available through a limited number of CFTC-registered platforms. Existing regulated crypto derivatives trading in the U.S. Is largely concentrated at CME Group, which lists Bitcoin and Ether futures. Blockchain.com's entry, if approved, would add a native crypto-firm competitor to that regulated space.

What the CFTC's review timeline will be, and whether the agency will request modifications to the proposed contract structures, is not yet known. CFTC designation reviews have historically taken several months to more than a year, depending on the complexity of the application and the volume of public comment received.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com