Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Economy

South Korea's Ruling Party Calls for Delay of 2027 Crypto Tax

South Korea's Ruling Party Calls for Delay of 2027 Crypto Tax

With both the governing party and opposition now aligned against the January 2027 start date, the political path to postponement has narrowed considerably, placing the decision largely in the...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 28, 2026

South Korea's ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) joined opposition lawmakers and industry groups Monday in calling for a postponement of the country's planned cryptocurrency gains tax, which is currently scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, according to the Korea Times.

Rep. Min Byung-duk, a senior member of the DPK's policy committee, stated that concerns over the readiness of the country's tax infrastructure have grown as the deadline approaches, according to the Korea Times report published September 29, 2026.

The DPK's position is notable because the party holds a majority in the National Assembly. Its alignment with opposition parties and industry groups on this issue means that legislative action to delay the tax is now a realistic prospect rather than a fringe proposal.

South Korea's cryptocurrency gains tax has a history of delays. The levy was originally set to begin in 2022, then pushed to 2023, then to 2025, and most recently to January 2027, according to prior Korea Times reporting. Each postponement has been justified on grounds including technical unreadiness, market volatility, and calls for a more comprehensive regulatory framework to accompany the tax.

Under the current plan, gains from cryptocurrency trading above 2.5 million Korean won (approximately $1,800 USD) per year would be taxed at 20 percent, with an additional local income tax bringing the effective rate to 22 percent, according to prior legislative summaries reported by Korean financial media.

Industry groups have argued that the tax system lacks the infrastructure to accurately track and verify crypto transactions across multiple domestic and international exchanges, and that reporting requirements for individual investors remain unclear. The Korea Times report indicates these concerns have not been fully resolved ahead of the planned rollout.

The Ministry of Economy and Finance has not publicly responded to the DPK's call as of the date of this report. What would clarify the government's position is a formal statement from the ministry or a bill introduced in the National Assembly specifying a new implementation date.

South Korea is one of several major economies navigating the legislative challenges of taxing digital assets. Japan taxes crypto gains as miscellaneous income at rates up to 55 percent, while the United States treats cryptocurrency as property subject to capital gains tax, according to public tax authority documentation from each respective country. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, which took full effect in 2024, established disclosure requirements but left member states to determine their own tax treatment.

The practical stakes for South Korean investors are significant. South Korea has one of the world's highest per-capita rates of cryptocurrency ownership. A 2024 Financial Services Commission survey found that approximately 6.4 percent of the South Korean adult population held crypto assets, totaling roughly 7.78 million individuals.

A further delay would extend a period of tax uncertainty for those investors and for the exchanges that would be responsible for withholding and remitting the tax. Exchanges have previously stated that compliance systems require substantial lead time to implement, which has been one of the technical arguments cited in prior postponement debates.

The National Assembly's strategy and finance committee would need to act before the end of its current legislative session to prevent the January 2027 date from remaining in force. The timeline for any committee vote or floor action has not been announced as of September 28, 2026.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com