Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
International

Israel Strikes Three Southern Lebanon Towns Despite Ceasefire Agreement

Israel Strikes Three Southern Lebanon Towns Despite Ceasefire Agreement

Continued Israeli military action inside Lebanese territory after a ceasefire agreement tests the durability of that arrangement and raises questions about enforcement mechanisms.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 25, 2026

Israeli forces struck three towns in southern Lebanon and shelled two additional areas on September 25, 2026, according to Lebanon's state-run National News Agency, despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several months.

The strikes hit the towns of Sarbin, al-Mansouri, and Qantara, according to the National News Agency. Artillery fire separately struck Wadi al-Saloqi and Wadi Zibqin, the agency reported, as cited by Middle East Eye.

The Lebanese National News Agency is the official state wire service of Lebanon and serves as the primary public record of government-confirmed events inside the country. Its reporting does not independently confirm casualty figures or the stated purpose of the strikes. No immediate statement from the Israeli military explaining the basis for the strikes was included in available source material at the time of publication.

The ceasefire in question followed a period of cross-border hostilities between Israeli forces and Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant and political organization that has held significant influence in southern Lebanon for decades. The terms of that ceasefire, including which parties are bound by it and what monitoring body if any oversees compliance, were not fully detailed in available source material. What those terms require of each party would be central to any legal or diplomatic assessment of September 25 activity.

Southern Lebanon has been a recurring site of Israeli military operations across multiple decades. Israel conducted a large-scale military campaign in Lebanon in 2006 following cross-border attacks by Hezbollah, a conflict that ended with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, which called for a cessation of hostilities and established an expanded UN Interim Force in Lebanon, known as UNIFIL. That resolution required the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the disarmament of armed groups in southern Lebanon. Compliance by all parties has been disputed repeatedly in the years since.

More recently, Israeli operations in Lebanon intensified in late 2024 in connection with the broader regional conflict that began following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. A ceasefire agreement for Lebanon was reached in late 2024, but the precise date that agreement took effect and its full terms were not available in the source material used for this report.

The five areas named in the Lebanese National News Agency report, Sarbin, al-Mansouri, Qantara, Wadi al-Saloqi, and Wadi Zibqin, are all located in the south of Lebanon, the region most directly affected by the 2024 hostilities and the subsequent ceasefire. Residents of that area have experienced repeated displacement over successive conflict cycles, according to prior UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reporting.

UNIFIL, the UN peacekeeping force stationed in southern Lebanon since 1978 and expanded after 2006, operates in the same geographic zone where the September 25 strikes occurred. Whether UNIFIL recorded or responded to the reported strikes was not available in the source material at the time of publication.

The Lebanese government has not issued a formal diplomatic response to the reported strikes as of the time this article was written. What form any response might take, whether through the United Nations, direct bilateral channels, or other mechanisms, is unknown. A formal Lebanese government statement or a response from the Israeli military would clarify the respective positions of both parties on whether the September 25 activity was consistent with ceasefire terms.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com