Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Crypto Markets

BitMEX Closes After 11 Years, Urges Users to Withdraw Remaining Funds

BitMEX Closes After 11 Years, Urges Users to Withdraw Remaining Funds

The shutdown of one of crypto's earliest derivatives platforms removes a significant venue for leveraged trading and tests whether user withdrawals process without incident.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 23, 2026

BitMEX, the cryptocurrency derivatives exchange founded in 2014, officially ended trading operations on September 23, 2026, after more than 11 years of activity, according to CoinTelegraph. The platform has stated that withdrawals remain open and has urged all users to remove their funds from the exchange.

BitMEX launched in Seychelles in 2014 and became one of the most widely used platforms for Bitcoin perpetual swap contracts, a form of derivative that allows traders to speculate on cryptocurrency prices with leverage. At its peak, the exchange reported daily trading volumes in the billions of dollars, making it a central venue for institutional and retail traders seeking leveraged crypto exposure.

The platform is relevant to US investors because BitMEX contracts for assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are denominated and settled in cryptocurrency, and the exchange historically served a global user base that included US-based participants prior to a 2020 regulatory action.

In October 2020, the US Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed charges against BitMEX and its founders, including Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, and Samuel Reed, alleging violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and operation of an unregistered trading platform. The CFTC complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York, stated that BitMEX had conducted business with US customers without registering as a futures commission merchant. Hayes later pleaded guilty to Bank Secrecy Act violations in federal court. The charges and subsequent guilty plea are part of the public federal court record.

Following the 2020 enforcement action, BitMEX restricted access for US-based users and underwent leadership and ownership changes. The company was subsequently acquired by a group of investors operating under the BXM Operations entity, which attempted to reposition the platform as a compliant international derivatives venue. Those efforts did not prevent the exchange's eventual closure.

The mechanics of the shutdown are straightforward: trading order books have been disabled, meaning no new positions can be opened or existing positions can be added to. Withdrawals, however, remain operational. The exchange's public statement, as reported by CoinTelegraph, indicated that users who hold funds on the platform must initiate withdrawals through the standard interface. It is not publicly known what deadline, if any, applies before unclaimed funds are handled under a separate legal or administrative process. That detail would be revealed through any formal wind-down filing or notice published by BitMEX's operating entity.

For US investors, the closure is relevant primarily as a market structure event. BitMEX pioneered the perpetual swap contract, a product now replicated across dozens of exchanges including Binance, Bybit, and OKX, as well as regulated US venues such as CME Group, which offers cash-settled Bitcoin futures. The platform's closure does not directly reduce the total available liquidity for leveraged crypto trading, given the scale of competing venues, but it does remove a name with historical significance to the derivatives market's development.

Open interest data from BitMEX at the time of closure was not independently available in the source material reviewed. That figure, which would indicate how much capital remained in active contracts at shutdown, would be found in the exchange's public market data dashboard or a third-party aggregator such as Coinglass.

The closure comes at a moment when the broader crypto derivatives market is under increased regulatory scrutiny globally. A separate regulatory development reported this week involves EU central banks challenging the Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, known as MiCA, over its approach to stablecoin liquidity requirements. That dispute, reported by CryptoSlate, centers on whether mandatory bank deposit requirements or liquidity testing windows better protect against stablecoin redemption runs, and it reflects a broader international tension between innovation-friendly crypto frameworks and financial stability concerns.

For users with funds remaining on BitMEX, the practical step is to initiate a withdrawal before any administrative freeze is imposed. The exchange has not publicly stated when withdrawal access will end, and users seeking that information should monitor official communications from BitMEX directly.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com