Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Political Intelligence

14 Nations Expected to Designate 25 Latin American Groups as Terrorists

14 Nations Expected to Designate 25 Latin American Groups as Terrorists

The coordinated designations, timed to the U.N. General Assembly, reflect a measurable expansion of Washington's foreign terrorist organization framework beyond U.S. Borders.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 22, 2026

Fourteen countries are expected to designate 25 Latin American criminal organizations as terrorist groups on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly this week, mirroring a policy posture the Trump administration has pursued domestically since early 2025, according to reporting by The New York Times.

The coordinated move parallels actions the Trump administration took in February 2025, when the State Department designated eight organizations, including Tren de Aragua and MS-13, as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. That designation was published in the Federal Register on February 20, 2025.

FTO designation under U.S. Law carries specific legal consequences. It is unlawful for any person in or entering the United States to knowingly provide material support or resources to a designated group. Financial institutions are required to block funds in which a designated group holds an interest and must report the blocking to the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

The Trump administration has argued that applying the terrorist label to cartels enables broader use of counterterrorism statutes in prosecutions, expands the legal basis for deportations, and opens access to intelligence-sharing mechanisms typically reserved for national security threats. Critics of the approach, including several legal scholars cited in congressional testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2025, have argued that the designation conflates criminal enterprises with ideologically motivated terrorist groups, a distinction that matters for how courts evaluate evidence and due process.

The 14 nations expected to make announcements at the U.N. General Assembly were not individually named in the Times report available at publication. Their identities, and the specific organizations each country plans to designate, are unknown. The official text of any designation would appear in each country's equivalent of a federal register or official government gazette. For the U.S. Side of any coordinated announcement, the relevant public record would be a State Department press release or a new Federal Register notice.

The diplomatic effort reflects a pattern of the current administration using multilateral forums to build consensus around domestic enforcement frameworks. Whether the designations by allied nations carry reciprocal legal obligations with U.S. Law, such as shared asset-blocking requirements or extradition protocols, is not established in available public records. A State Department spokesperson has not issued a public statement on the expected UNGA announcements as of the date of this article.

Congress has not passed legislation in the current session that formally requires allied nations to adopt compatible terrorist designations as a condition of security assistance, though the House Homeland Security Committee approved a discussion draft in April 2026 that would authorize the President to withhold certain foreign aid from countries that do not designate cartel groups identified by the State Department. That draft has not been scheduled for a floor vote as of September 22, 2026, according to the Congressional Record.

The domestic legal and enforcement consequences of U.S. FTO designations are substantial. Once a group is listed, immigration courts can treat membership or affiliation as a disqualifying bar to asylum, a standard the Board of Immigration Appeals has upheld in several unpublished decisions. ICE and the Justice Department have both cited FTO status in charging documents for cases involving alleged cartel members, as reflected in publicly available court filings in the Southern District of Texas and the Eastern District of New York.

For earlier related coverage, see ICE Agent Shoots Venezuelan Man in Texas; Bullet Lodged Near Spine, which examines a separate enforcement incident connected to the administration's expanded use of counterterrorism tools against Latin American criminal networks.

Several facts remain unknown at publication. The complete list of 14 participating countries has not been confirmed in any public document. The specific 25 organizations targeted for designation by the allied nations have not been published. It is also unknown whether any of the 25 groups are already on the U.S. State Department FTO list, or whether the allied designations would result in new OFAC blocking actions against financial institutions with exposure to those groups. A State Department Federal Register notice or a formal UNGA joint statement would be the documents most likely to resolve those open questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com