Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Politics

Trump Proceeds With F-35 Sale to Saudi Arabia Over Intelligence Agency Objections

Trump Proceeds With F-35 Sale to Saudi Arabia Over Intelligence Agency Objections

The administration's decision to move forward puts two competing national security priorities in direct tension: deepening a Gulf alliance versus protecting classified aircraft technology from...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 18, 2026

The Trump administration is proceeding with a proposed $24.3 billion sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia after U.S. Intelligence agencies warned in internal reports that China could acquire or steal American warplane technology if the aircraft are delivered to Riyadh, according to reporting by The New York Times published September 17, 2026.

The State Department formally notified Congress of the proposed transaction in an earlier filing, as previously reported by The Congressional Times. Under the Arms Export Control Act, major defense sales require a congressional notification period during which lawmakers may introduce a joint resolution of disapproval. The notification document, which is a public record available through the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, sets the formal legal clock for congressional review.

Intelligence agency warnings about technology transfer risk are documented in internal reports, according to The New York Times. The specific agencies that authored those reports, the classification level of the documents, and the precise mechanism of potential Chinese acquisition described in the warnings are not publicly known. A Freedom of Information Act request or a congressional committee subpoena would be the procedural instruments most likely to surface those details.

The F-35 is produced by Lockheed Martin under a series of contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense. The aircraft incorporates stealth geometry, advanced sensor fusion systems, and software architecture that the Pentagon has designated as among the most sensitive military technologies the United States possesses. Export of the platform requires presidential approval under the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2776, and is subject to end-use monitoring requirements set by the Defense Technology Security Administration.

Saudi Arabia does not currently operate F-35s. The proposed sale would make it one of a small number of non-NATO countries approved to receive the platform. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country currently operating F-35s, a status that carries particular significance under longstanding U.S. Policy commitments to preserve Israel's qualitative military edge in the region, codified in the U.S.-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-150).

The intelligence concern, as described by The New York Times, centers on the possibility that Chinese actors could obtain F-35 technology through Saudi Arabia, either through theft, espionage, or unauthorized technical access once the aircraft are on Saudi soil. The United States has previously suspended or conditioned arms transfers over technology-security concerns. In 2020, the Trump administration temporarily paused F-35 transfers to the United Arab Emirates following concerns related to Huawei network equipment on UAE soil, a hold that was maintained and later formalized under the Biden administration before ultimately collapsing in 2022.

No member of Congress has yet introduced a joint resolution of disapproval targeting this specific sale as of the date of this report. The Congressional Research Service has documented that Congress has never successfully passed such a resolution into law, though the threat of one has historically prompted executive branch negotiations with lawmakers. Whether any member intends to introduce such a resolution in the current review period is not publicly known.

The administration has not publicly released the internal risk assessments cited by The New York Times, nor has it issued a formal public response addressing the intelligence concerns. The White House did not provide a statement for this report. What legal or technical mitigations, if any, are being built into the sale agreement to address technology security risks, such as source code restrictions, maintenance limitations, or end-use certification requirements, remains unknown. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency's formal Letter of Offer and Acceptance to Saudi Arabia, which would contain some of those terms, is not fully public in its current form.

The proposed sale is also taking place against a broader diplomatic backdrop. The United States and Saudi Arabia have been in ongoing negotiations over a security partnership framework, and Riyadh has separately pursued civilian nuclear technology agreements with Washington. Whether the F-35 transaction is formally linked to or conditioned on progress in those parallel negotiations is not established in the public record. A State Department cable or National Security Council document would be the instrument most likely to contain that information, neither of which is currently available.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com