Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Global Intelligence

Thirlwall Inquiry Finds Letby Victims Could Have Been Saved

Thirlwall Inquiry Finds Letby Victims Could Have Been Saved

The public report identifies systemic failures in hospital safeguarding as a structural problem, not merely individual misconduct, raising questions about oversight across the National Health Service.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 15, 2026

A public inquiry into the crimes of convicted nurse Lucy Letby has concluded that the deaths and near-deaths of some babies she attacked could have been prevented had safeguarding practices been properly followed, according to findings published September 15, 2026, by BBC News.

Letby was convicted of the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of seven others, one of whom she attempted to kill on two separate occasions, at the Countess of Chester Hospital in England. She is currently serving a whole-life prison sentence following her conviction, which was delivered by a jury at Manchester Crown Court in August 2023, according to court records reported widely at that time.

The Thirlwall Inquiry, led by Lady Justice Thirlwall, was established by the UK government to examine how Letby was able to commit the offences over a period of years without being stopped by hospital management or external regulators. The inquiry takes its name from the presiding judge and is a statutory public inquiry under UK law.

Among the central findings, the inquiry determined that concerns raised by consultant paediatricians at the hospital about Letby were not acted upon with sufficient urgency by senior management. BBC News reported that the inquiry identified specific failures in the chain of safeguarding responsibility, though the full list of recommendations was being published in stages as of the report date.

The inquiry also examined the role of the Countess of Chester Hospital's executive leadership, which had previously required some doctors who raised alarms about Letby to issue apologies to her before those concerns were escalated to external authorities, according to evidence heard during the inquiry's public sessions in 2024 and 2025.

The National Health Service regulator, NHS England, and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are among the bodies whose oversight functions fall within the inquiry's scope. The CQC had inspected the Countess of Chester Hospital during the period in which Letby was working in the neonatal unit, according to publicly available CQC inspection records.

Letby's crimes occurred primarily between June 2015 and June 2016 in the hospital's neonatal unit in Chester, England. The delay between the period of offending and the inquiry's findings, spanning more than a decade, reflects the length of time required for criminal prosecution, conviction, and then the establishment and conduct of a statutory inquiry.

The Thirlwall Inquiry received written and oral evidence from hospital executives, medical staff, regulatory officials, and the families of victims. Hearings were conducted in public and transcripts were made available by the inquiry secretariat throughout its proceedings.

Families of the victims have been represented throughout the inquiry process and are among those with a formal interest in its recommendations. Whether the UK government will accept and implement the inquiry's recommendations in full, in part, or on a modified timeline is a matter for the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whose response had not been published as of the report date.

The full written report from Lady Justice Thirlwall sets out the complete findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The extent to which those recommendations require legislative change, regulatory reform, or changes to NHS internal governance procedures will determine the mechanism and timeline for any resulting action.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com