Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Global Intelligence

Iran Fires Missiles at U.S. Military Base in Jordan

Iran Fires Missiles at U.S. Military Base in Jordan

The overnight strike marks a direct Iranian attack on American forces and raises questions about the trajectory of a conflict that began with Operation Epic Fury in late February 2026.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · September 9, 2026

Iran fired a barrage of missiles at a U.S. Military base in Jordan overnight on September 9, 2026, according to reporting by Dan Lamothe and Rachel Chason in The Washington Post. The strike is described as the latest salvo in an ongoing conflict, occurring as Iranian leaders had in recent days signaled an escalatory posture.

The Washington Post report does not specify which base in Jordan was targeted, how many missiles were launched, or the extent of any casualties or damage. Those details remain unknown as of publication. An official U.S. Military damage assessment, once released, would provide that information.

The attack takes place within the broader context of Operation Epic Fury, the name the Trump administration gave to its military campaign against Iran, which began in late February 2026. Writing in Newsweek, analyst Ilan Berman notes that when the operation was launched, the administration's expectation was that the fight against Iran would be quick and decisive. That assessment has not been borne out over the intervening months, according to Berman's analysis in Newsweek.

Berman argues that Washington now requires a sustained, longer-term strategy rather than one premised on a rapid resolution. He does not specify what operational or diplomatic components such a strategy should include, but frames the current moment as one requiring recalibration.

A separate layer of the Iran conflict involves its economic dimension. The United States has pursued a sanctions campaign alongside its military operations. Writing in The National Interest, analyst James D. Durso warns that the latest round of U.S. Iran sanctions may be working against American strategic interests in Central Asia. According to Durso's analysis, secondary sanctions risk pushing Central Asian states toward closer alignment with Iran, Russia, or China, complicating U.S. Regional strategy.

Jordan has hosted U.S. Military personnel and facilities for decades as part of bilateral defense cooperation agreements. The country has served as a logistical and operational hub for U.S. Activities in the broader Middle East region. A direct Iranian missile strike on Jordanian soil targeting American forces represents a geographic expansion of the conflict beyond the theaters where fighting had previously been concentrated.

Iran has a documented history of using missile and drone strikes against U.S. Positions through both direct launches and proxy forces. In January 2024, prior to the current conflict, a drone strike attributed to Iranian-backed groups killed three U.S. Service members at a facility in Jordan known as Tower 22, according to previous U.S. Defense Department statements. That earlier incident triggered a significant U.S. Retaliatory strike campaign.

The timing of the current strike, following Iranian leaders' public signals of escalation in recent days, suggests the attack was deliberate rather than opportunistic. The Washington Post report characterizes it as part of an escalating pattern, though the specific Iranian statements that preceded the launch have not been fully detailed in available source material.

The U.S. Military's air defense systems and their performance in intercepting the incoming missiles have not been described in the source reporting available at the time of publication. Whether the missiles were intercepted, reached their targets, or caused structural or personnel damage is not yet established in the public record.

Congress has not publicly responded to the attack as of the time this article was prepared. The legal authorities under which Operation Epic Fury is being conducted, including any Authorization for Use of Military Force, have not been specified in the source material reviewed for this report.

The conflict's duration and the missile strike on Jordan together present the administration with decisions about whether to absorb the attack, respond militarily, or pursue a diplomatic channel. None of those paths has been announced publicly as of September 9, 2026.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com