Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Federal Charge Filed After Threatening Messages Sent to Missouri Judge

The case illustrates how federal interstate threat statutes apply when social media communications cross state lines to reach judicial officers.

The Congressional Times · July 31, 2026

Federal prosecutors have charged a California man with interstate transmission of a threatening communication after he allegedly sent a series of death threats to a Missouri judge via social media, according to public court records. The defendant, identified as Joseph Alfredo Vasquez Dumarce, is accused of sending the messages from a social media account identified in charging documents as 'yaeyae962' to Judge Ashlee Cole of Jackson County, Missouri, as reported by the New York Post on July 31, 2026.

The charge — interstate transmission of a threatening communication — is prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), a federal statute that criminalizes the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of any communication containing a threat to injure another person. A conviction under that statute carries a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison, per the statutory text.

Court filings indicate the threats were connected to the death of teenager Nolan Wells. Judge Cole is identified in the charging documents as the stepmother of one of Wells' friends, establishing the alleged basis for contact. The specific content of the messages, as described by the New York Post, included language referencing substantial bodily harm, including a phrase referencing blood. The Congressional Times has not independently reviewed the underlying criminal complaint.

Threats against judicial officers have drawn increased federal attention in recent years. The U.S. Marshals Service, which is responsible for protecting federal judges, reported a rise in threats against judicial personnel in its annual statistical summaries, though Judge Cole is a state-level jurist, not a federal officer. Jurisdiction in this case appears to rest on the interstate nature of the electronic transmission rather than the status of the recipient.

Several material facts remain unknown at this time, including whether Dumarce has entered a plea, the identity of the presiding federal district court judge, and whether additional charges have been filed or are being considered. The full text of the criminal complaint, which would contain the specific allegations and evidentiary basis, would be available through the federal court's Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system once docketed.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com