Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

New York's SAFE for Kids Act Takes Effect; Court Challenges Loom

New York joins a growing list of states restricting algorithmic feeds and late-night notifications for minors, but the legal durability of such laws remains unresolved at the federal court level.

The Congressional Times · July 29, 2026

New York State finalized the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act on Tuesday, July 29, 2026, with the law set to take effect early 2027, according to a state government announcement covered by the New York Post. The legislation prohibits social media platforms from delivering algorithmically personalized content to users under 18 and bars platforms from sending notifications to minor users during nighttime hours. The specific prohibited hours and the age-verification mechanism required of platforms are defined within the enacted statute, which is publicly available through the New York State Legislature's official records portal.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul's office confirmed the finalization of the law, which passed the state legislature earlier this year. The law applies to social media companies operating in New York and targets the algorithmic content-feed architecture that platforms use to maximize user engagement. Under the statute, companies must disable personalized algorithmic feeds for authenticated minor users and restrict notification delivery to defined daytime windows, per the text of the enacted legislation.

Similar laws enacted in other states have faced legal challenges. Legislation in states including Arkansas and Utah targeting minors' access to social media platforms was blocked by federal courts on First Amendment grounds, as reported by multiple verified news outlets and reflected in court records filed in the U.S. District Courts for those jurisdictions. The legal challenges to those statutes were brought primarily by NetChoice, a technology industry trade group registered with the American Bar Association and active in multiple federal circuits. Whether NetChoice or a comparable organization will file a legal challenge against the New York law has not been publicly announced as of this date.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which holds enforcement authority over children's online privacy under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), has not issued a formal statement on the New York law as of July 29, 2026. COPPA, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 6501 et seq., currently applies to children under 13 and governs data collection practices rather than algorithmic feed design, meaning the New York law operates in a regulatory space not directly covered by existing federal statute.

What remains unknown is whether the state attorney general's office has identified a specific enforcement mechanism for verifying platform compliance with the algorithmic feed restriction, and what penalties are scheduled for non-compliant platforms. The full enforcement framework, including penalty schedules, would be detailed in the final regulatory text filed with the New York State Register, a public document. It is also unknown whether the legislature considered a private right of action for affected minors or their guardians; that determination would be visible in the legislative record and committee hearing transcripts, available through the New York State Legislature's public archives.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com