Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Poll: Majority of Harris Voters Oppose Data Centers Near Homes

A new survey reveals a widening partisan gap on data center development, with Democratic opposition outpacing Republican skepticism even as unfavorable views rise across all voter groups.

The Congressional Times · July 21, 2026

A Politico/Public First poll released Tuesday found that 53 percent of Americans who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 oppose data center development within three miles of their home, according to the Washington Examiner's report on the survey. The poll marks a measurable shift in public sentiment toward artificial intelligence infrastructure at a moment when data center construction has become a recurring issue in the 2026 midterm election cycle.

The survey indicates that animosity toward data centers has grown at a faster rate among Democrats than among Republicans, though the poll records declining support among all Americans regardless of partisan affiliation. The specific margin separating Democratic and Republican opposition was not detailed in the available summary; the full Politico/Public First poll crosstabs would contain those figures.

Data center development has drawn congressional attention on multiple fronts. Legislators have introduced measures related to energy consumption, water usage, and zoning preemption connected to large-scale AI infrastructure projects. The policy debate spans committees including Senate Commerce and House Energy and Commerce, though no single comprehensive federal data center bill has passed both chambers as of July 21, 2026.

The political salience of the issue is reflected in its appearance as a campaign-cycle data point. Candidates in competitive districts have begun addressing constituent concerns about proximity, noise, and utility grid strain associated with large facilities, according to reporting by the Washington Examiner. Whether that local opposition translates into specific federal legislative action remains unknown.

What is not yet established from publicly available records: the poll's full methodology, sample size, margin of error, and complete partisan crosstabs. Those details would be contained in the Politico/Public First poll release and would allow independent verification of the directional findings reported. The full poll document has not been independently reviewed by The Congressional Times as of publication.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com