Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Senate Reintroduces American Innovation and Choice Online Act

The bill's structure raises questions about whether antitrust legislation targeting dominant online platforms could functionally advantage legacy retail competitors — a dynamic that may shape how...

The Congressional Times · July 1, 2026

The American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA) has been reintroduced in the United States Senate, according to reporting by the Washington Examiner dated within the current legislative session. The bill targets large online marketplace operators — widely understood to include Amazon — by restricting certain self-preferencing practices that allow platforms to favor their own products and services over third-party sellers in search results and rankings.

Proponents of the legislation argue it would increase competition and expand consumer choice in online retail. Senate sponsors have framed the bill as a necessary check on the market power of dominant digital platforms, consistent with a broader wave of tech-focused antitrust activity that has moved through Congress in recent sessions. The bill has been circulating in various forms since at least the 117th Congress.

Critics of the measure, including analysts cited by the Washington Examiner, contend that restricting the operational advantages of large online platforms could depress the efficiency gains that consumers currently benefit from — including lower prices, faster delivery, and consolidated search results. The argument holds that if algorithmic self-preferencing is curtailed without addressing the structural cost advantages of traditional brick-and-mortar retailers, the practical effect could strengthen established physical retail chains rather than introduce new digital competitors.

The legislative text of the current reintroduction, including the full list of Senate co-sponsors and committee referral, would be available through Congress.gov under the bill's formal designation. Lobbying disclosures filed with the Senate Office of Public Records under the Lobbying Disclosure Act would identify which organizations have registered to advocate for or against the measure; those filings are publicly searchable at lda.senate.gov. The Congressional Budget Office has not yet published a cost or economic impact score for the reintroduced version as of July 1, 2026, according to available public records.

What remains unknown at this stage is whether the bill has been scheduled for committee markup, which senators beyond the lead sponsors have formally co-signed the reintroduced version, and whether the House has introduced a companion bill. Those details would appear in the Congressional Record and on Congress.gov upon any official floor or committee action.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com