Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Supreme Court Blocks Trump's Removal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook

The ruling preserves Federal Reserve independence in the immediate term, but the Court's concurrent expansion of presidential removal authority over other agencies signals continued legal...

The Congressional Times · June 29, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order blocking President Trump's attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to reporting by Bloomberg published June 29, 2026. The Court's action prevents Cook's removal while litigation over the President's authority to dismiss her proceeds. The specific docket number and full opinion language were not disclosed in available source material; the complete court filing would specify the precise legal basis for the stay.

In the same period, the Court issued separate rulings that expanded presidential removal power over other federal agencies, according to the same Bloomberg report. The scope of those rulings — including which agencies and which classes of officials are now subject to broader presidential removal authority — is not fully detailed in available source material. The full opinions, available through the Supreme Court's public docket at supremecourt.gov, would provide the statutory and constitutional reasoning.

The Federal Reserve's structure gives its Board of Governors a degree of independence from direct executive control, a design codified in the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. § 241 et seq.), which provides that governors serve 14-year terms and may be removed only "for cause." The Trump administration's legal position — that the President holds broader removal authority — mirrors arguments the administration has advanced regarding other independent agency leadership. Court filings in the Cook case would specify the administration's exact statutory and constitutional claims.

Separately, 25 state Democratic administrations and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit Monday against the Trump administration challenging Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services interim guidance implementing Medicaid work requirements, according to the Washington Examiner. The plaintiffs — governors and attorneys general — allege the CMS guidance exceeds the authority granted by the GOP budget reconciliation bill passed earlier this year. The case docket, which would confirm the filing court, lead plaintiffs, and precise legal claims, had not been fully published in available source material as of this report.

What remains unknown across both legal matters: the timeline for final Supreme Court resolution of the Cook removal question; the full list of agencies affected by the Court's expanded removal rulings; and the assigned federal district court and judge for the Medicaid work-requirements lawsuit. The Supreme Court's public docket, CMS's official regulatory filings in the Federal Register, and the federal district court's PACER filing system would answer each of those questions respectively.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com