Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Political Intelligence

Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro Missed 43% of Recorded Senate Votes in 2026

Voting-attendance data from Brazil's Senate carries direct relevance for U.S. observers tracking the Bolsonaro family's political trajectory and its documented ties to American conservative donors...

The Congressional Times · June 28, 2026

Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ), a declared pre-candidate for Brazil's presidency and a figure with documented connections to U.S.-based conservative political organizations, was absent for 43 percent of recorded nominal votes in Brazil's Senate through June 22, 2026, according to a tabulation published by Folha de S.Paulo citing official Senate voting records. Of 49 nominal votes analyzed — proceedings in which each senator must register an individual vote — Bolsonaro cast no vote in 21 instances, ranking him fifth among absentees, tied with four other senators.

The U.S. dimension of this record is not incidental. Federal Election Commission filings and reporting by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project have previously documented fundraising activity and political networking between members of the Bolsonaro family and American political donors, PACs, and advocacy organizations. Attendance and legislative engagement records are a standard metric used by U.S. campaign finance analysts when assessing the governing credibility of allied foreign politicians who solicit American political support.

The Folha analysis excluded symbolic votes, in which individual positions are not publicly recorded, focusing exclusively on nominal deliberations that produce a verifiable individual voting record. The methodology is consistent with the approach applied by the U.S. GovTrack service when calculating congressional participation scores for members of the U.S. House and Senate.

No statement from Flávio Bolsonaro's office explaining the absences was included in the Folha report, and it is unknown whether official Senate records classify the missed votes as excused absences, unexcused absences, or conflicts. Brazil's Senate attendance rules, like those of the U.S. Senate, distinguish between categories of absence for pay and quorum purposes. The full granular breakdown of each missed vote by date and subject matter is publicly available in the Brazilian Senate's electronic voting archive at senado.leg.br, which would reveal whether absences clustered around specific legislative periods or topics.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com