Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Shared Parenting Bills Advance in Some States, Stall in Others Amid Bipartisan Shifts

Legislative movement on equal custody standards is reshaping traditional party alignments on family law, creating unusual coalitions and opponents within both parties.

The Congressional Times · June 21, 2026

Shared parenting legislation — bills that would establish a legal presumption of roughly equal physical custody in divorce and separation proceedings — has gained traction in multiple state legislatures in 2025 and 2026, according to tracking by the National Parents Organization, a nonprofit advocacy group that publishes an annual legislative scorecard based on publicly available bill text and committee votes. The organization's 2025 report identified active shared parenting legislation in more than 20 states.

In Oklahoma, House Bill 1955, which would have created a rebuttable presumption of equal parenting time, passed the House in March 2025 by a recorded vote of 76-18 (Oklahoma House Journal, March 14, 2025) but did not receive a Senate floor vote before the session adjourned, according to the Oklahoma Legislature's official bill status portal. The bill's Senate sponsor, whose identity is listed in the official record, attributed the stall to procedural scheduling decisions by Senate leadership, as reported by The Oklahoman on May 12, 2025. The specific members of Senate leadership responsible for the scheduling decision are identified in the Oklahoma Senate's published leadership roster.

In Louisiana, Senate Bill 203 from the 2025 regular session, which proposed a similar equal-time presumption, was deferred in the Senate Judiciary A Committee on April 29, 2025, per the Louisiana Legislature's publicly posted committee action log. Committee membership and individual votes on the deferral motion are listed in that same public record. Both Oklahoma and Louisiana have Republican-controlled legislatures, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures' current partisan composition data.

On the Democratic side, several legislators in states including Colorado and Minnesota co-sponsored or voted for shared parenting measures during the same period, representing a shift from prior sessions in which the legislation drew more partisan opposition, according to bill co-sponsorship records available on those states' official legislative websites. The National Parents Organization's 2025 state legislative report attributes part of the bipartisan momentum to increased engagement by fathers' rights advocacy groups with Democratic lawmakers on economic equity arguments tied to child support obligations.

At the federal level, the Families First Act (H.R. 4822, 119th Congress), introduced in July 2025 and referred to the House Judiciary Committee, would condition a portion of federal Title IV-D child support enforcement funding on states adopting a shared parenting presumption, according to the bill text published on Congress.gov. As of June 21, 2026, the bill has not received a committee hearing, per the Congress.gov bill tracking page. Co-sponsors as of that date are listed in the official co-sponsorship record on Congress.gov and include members from both parties, though the precise count of Republican versus Democratic co-sponsors is available directly from that record.

What remains unknown is whether Senate leadership in Oklahoma and Louisiana made scheduling decisions based on lobbying activity, constituent pressure, or internal caucus dynamics. Lobbying disclosure records filed with the Oklahoma Ethics Commission and the Louisiana Board of Ethics under each state's lobbying registration laws would identify any registered lobbyists who communicated with those chambers on the relevant bills during the applicable reporting periods. Those filings are public records available on each agency's website.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com