Political Intelligence

Trump Blocks Clayton DNI Hearing, Senate Republicans Push Back

The episode illustrates a recurring tension between White House confirmation strategy and Senate Republicans' timeline for filling intelligence and law enforcement vacancies.

The Congressional Times · June 17, 2026

President Donald Trump directed DNI nominee Jay Clayton not to appear at his scheduled Senate confirmation hearing on June 17, 2026, according to a post Trump made on Truth Social, as reported by the New York Post. The directive came hours before the Senate was prepared to fast-track Clayton's confirmation. Trump stated he wanted the Senate to first confirm Clayton's replacement as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York before proceeding with the DNI hearing. Senate Republicans initially sought to proceed with the Clayton hearing despite the White House directive, according to the New York Post's reporting. At least one Republican senator publicly characterized Trump's move as a 'colossal mistake,' per the same report, reflecting a willingness among some GOP members to assert the Senate's constitutional role in the confirmation process. The Clayton nomination intersects with a separate personnel matter at the Southern District of New York. CBS News reported that Jamie McDonald, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell — a firm CBS News described as having deep ties to Trump — is the president's pick to helm that office. The precise sequencing Trump is demanding, and whether Senate leadership will comply, was not publicly confirmed in available records as of publication time. The Senate's confirmation schedule, including any revised hearing dates for Clayton, would be reflected in the Senate Executive Calendar maintained by the Senate Secretary's office. What remains unknown is whether Senate Majority Leader John Thune will formally reschedule the Clayton DNI hearing, and what specific condition the White House has set for the SDNY confirmation. Those details would be disclosed in official Senate scheduling notices and any subsequent White House communications entered into the public record.

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com