Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

U.S. Government Directs Anthropic to Block Foreign National AI Access

A federal directive targeting a private AI company's model access marks a notable exercise of executive authority over commercial artificial intelligence deployment, raising questions about the...

The Congressional Times · June 13, 2026

The U.S. government issued a directive to artificial intelligence company Anthropic on Friday, June 13, 2026, instructing the company to prevent any foreign national from accessing its latest and most powerful AI models, according to a statement from Anthropic reported by NBC News. Anthropic confirmed the directive and stated it had suspended access to the affected models in response.

The nature of the legal authority used to issue the directive — whether an executive order, a national security finding, an export control mechanism under the Export Administration Regulations administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), or another statutory instrument — has not been publicly disclosed as of publication time. The specific models affected and the precise definition of "foreign national" as applied in the directive have also not been detailed in publicly available records.

A word from our sponsor: Have you thought about life insurance or annuities but didn't want the sales pressure? PolicyPrepper.com is a free, no-pressure educational platform with a built-in AI that answers all your questions — no agent calls, no obligation. Check it out at PolicyPrepper.com.

Anthropics's frontier AI models have been the subject of ongoing federal policy discussions. The company entered into a voluntary commitment with the Biden administration in July 2023, alongside six other AI firms, to implement safety measures for AI development, as documented by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). The Trump administration subsequently issued Executive Order 14179 in January 2025, rescinding prior Biden-era AI policy and directing federal agencies to revise AI governance frameworks, according to the Federal Register (Vol. 90, No. 19).

Export control of advanced technology, including AI software, falls under the jurisdiction of BIS within the Department of Commerce. The Export Administration Regulations (15 C.F.R. Parts 730–774) govern whether and how controlled technologies may be shared with foreign nationals, including through "deemed export" provisions applicable to domestic interactions. Whether Friday's directive was issued under this existing framework or a separate authority is not confirmed in any publicly available court filing, agency notice, or Federal Register publication reviewed as of this writing.

What remains unknown: the specific statutory or executive authority cited in the directive, which agency issued it, whether Anthropic has been subpoenaed or received a formal legal order, and whether the suspension applies to paying customers, API users, or both. A Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of Commerce and the National Security Council, or a congressional inquiry producing a formal response for the record, would be the documents most likely to answer these questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com