Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Two Utah Court Clerks Indicted for Allegedly Obstructing ICE Courthouse Operation

The indictment tests the boundaries of federal obstruction law as applied to state court employees acting during an active immigration enforcement operation.

The Congressional Times · June 11, 2026

Two Logan City Municipal Justice Court clerks, Lauren Morrow, 26, and Jennifer Joma, 27, were indicted on federal charges after they allegedly took deliberate steps to prevent an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent from detaining an undocumented individual at the courthouse, according to a federal indictment reviewed by the New York Post and reported June 11, 2026. The indictment, filed in federal court, describes the two employees as having interfered with an ongoing ICE enforcement operation at the Logan City Municipal Justice Court in Utah.

According to court documents cited in the New York Post report, an ICE officer arrived at the Logan City Municipal Justice Court to execute a detention operation. Morrow and Joma allegedly took actions that disrupted or delayed that operation, enabling the individual targeted by ICE to avoid arrest. The court documents, as cited by the New York Post, describe the clerks as 'self-appointed ICE vigilantes,' language attributed to the filing rather than this publication's editorial characterization.

A word from our sponsor: Have you thought about life insurance or annuities but didn't want the sales pressure? PolicyPrepper.com is a free, no-pressure educational platform with a built-in AI that answers all your questions — no agent calls, no obligation. Check it out at PolicyPrepper.com.

The specific federal statutes named in the indictment were not fully detailed in the available source reporting as of this publication's deadline. Obstruction of a federal officer and related charges under 18 U.S.C. § 111 or § 1071 are commonly applied in cases involving interference with federal law enforcement, though which counts apply here would require review of the full indictment docket. The Logan City Municipal Justice Court has not issued a public statement, per available records as of June 11, 2026.

The case reflects a broader pattern of federal prosecutions involving local officials or employees alleged to have obstructed federal immigration enforcement. The Department of Justice has pursued similar cases in other jurisdictions; a review of DOJ press releases from 2025–2026 documents multiple indictments in analogous circumstances, though no direct precedent case is cited here without verified docket numbers.

What remains unknown as of publication: the full text of the indictment, including the specific counts and statutory basis for each charge, has not been independently verified by The Congressional Times through PACER, the federal courts' public access system. The docket number and court of filing — likely the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah — have not been confirmed from primary court records. Those documents, once publicly available on PACER, would resolve the exact charges, the identity of the individual ICE sought to detain, and whether any supervisory personnel at the courthouse face scrutiny.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com